Tuesday, January 5, 2021

The Scammer who wanted his country to be saved

Glenn Greenwald was sitting in his home office in Rio de Janeiro one sleepy Sunday morning in May 2019, when he received a phone call from a number he did not know. He hasn't replied. But a WhatsApp message arrived 30 seconds later from Manuela d'Ávila, a Brazilian leftist politician who had run for vice president next to the center-left Workers' Party presidential candidate the previous year; their ticket came second to far-right former military captain Jair Bolsonaro. "Glenn," she wrote, "I have something urgent I need to talk to you about."

D'Ávila was not well known to Greenwald, the American journalist who broke the news of Edward Snowden's NSA leaks, so his interest was piqued by the weekend post. Greenwald hurried downstairs to the bedroom to wake his husband, the left-wing Brazilian politician David Miranda, who knew d'Ávila better, when she explained that she had stumbled into an enormous possible story and wanted to speak on the phone.

D'Ávila plunged into a strange story when the two men put her on the speakerphone: Someone had just hacked her Telegram account, then offered to give her evidence that would "save the country." Greenwald had to ask her to slow down. "She was thrilled," he says. D'Ávila clarified that the hacker claimed to possess explosive material that implicated Bolsonaro's government, and in particular Brazil's Ministry of Justice and Public Security.

D'Ávila called to see if she would be able to pass on the source to Greenwald. He consented.

There was an issue right away, though. The hacker wanted to talk about Telegram, but for reasons the mysterious souce had just revealed, Greenwald didn't have the app. "For years, the people I trust most, including Snowden, have warned against their vulnerabilities," Greenwald says. Still, Greenwald mounted Telegram, after hanging up with d'Ávila, and made contact warily.

Fortunately," Greenwald recalls, "I didn't need to say much of anything because he was just off for the races. Messaging in Portuguese, the source claimed to own an enormous amount of content. He said he had been working through it for months and had only managed to read about 10% of it, but had already uncovered signs of conspiracy that, if disclosed, would set Brazilian politics on fire. The source began to submit samples of Greenwald: audio messages, several papers.

The individual asked after a few minutes if they could speak over the phone. For Greenwald, this set off yet another warning. With proxies and encryption, text exchanges can be disguised, but for someone who could track them, a voice will be easy to recognise. "Until I went to Hong Kong, I did not hear Snowden's voice," Greenwald says.

Yet he pushed on with Greenwald. He took the call and let most of the talk be done by the source, who claimed to be living in the US and attending Harvard. The source explained to Greenwald that a close friend at Telegram had introduced him to the app's Russian owners, the Durov brothers, and had gained access to the Telegram accounts of people through them. What didn't make a lot of sense," Greenwald says, "Why build a supposedly safe messaging app and give someone the keys to their back door? Greenwald doubted the Harvard story of the hacker as well.

Are you being cautious? "Greenwald remembers having asked. "What you've done is pretty serious."

Don't think about that, oh right. They'll never catch me,' boasted the source. He said that he was using several proxies that made it almost impossible for someone to track him, and never again would he set foot on Brazilian soil. Greenwald kept it short, but said he needed to see the papers. The call was about four minutes long. "OK, I'm just going to start uploading them to your phone," said the source. He told Greenwald that it would take 12 to 15 hours for the upload to be completed.

Greenwald started receiving files from his Telegram account after the call, a large number of them, one after another. The source would periodically interject, giddily asking Greenwald to look at a specific text.

The files were still coming in when Greenwald went to bed that night; they had not stopped when he woke up in the morning. "It was just going and going every time I opened up my Telegram app," Greenwald says. "That's when I knew this was a massive archive. And I was very persuaded that it was true.

Greenwald and Miranda addressed the risks of reporting on leaks from the beginning. Unlike in the case of Snowden, Greenwald will remain in the same nation as the officials he would reveal. And after his predecessor, Jean Wyllys, of the same party, fled Brazil and gave up his seat over death threats and homophobic violence, Miranda took his seat in the National Congress. In 2018, Marielle Franco, a left-wing politician and close associate of Greenwald and Miranda's, was murdered in her car; two former policemen were charged with her murder.

The same Sunday, Greenwald called Intercept Brasil's executive editor, Leandro Demori, part of the media collective that Greenwald co-founded after the 2014 Snowden leaks. If Demori was sitting down, Greenwald asked. "It's serious," he said. Demori, who was packing for a holiday, plopped down on his bunk. "You need to sit down right now." His mouth dropped as he listened to Greenwald: 'Oh my God,' he thought. "This is huge." Demori gave the project an enthusiastic green light once he had a sense of the content. The legal staff of The Intercept did likewise.

The next step was to find an easier and safer way to obtain all the material from the source, which was already trickling into Greenwald's phone via Telegram eight or nine days after contact was made by the hacker. As soon as possible, the journalists decided to protect the archive outside Brazil, in case authorities tried to confiscate it. So the security specialist of Intercept, Micah Lee, started planning to set up an end-to-end encrypted cloud storage platform to receive the content. The source, however, simply produced a Dropbox and dumped it all there. "His technical judgment was suspicious of me," Lee says. "He appeared overconfident."

As Greenwald drafted the first series of posts, he remained in constant touch with the hacker—or, rather, hackers. He got the feeling at some point that he was talking to at least two people. One of them seemed, Greenwald says, somewhat naive and idealistic. "And then, all of a sudden, I felt like I was talking to someone more jaded... a bit more slippery, and a bit more complicated." Sometimes, instead of "I," the source would also say "we"

However, the hacker was compliant with what he, or they, wanted. Greenwald was told, "I'm only doing this because I want to clean my country up." And the source consistently insisted that he was not involved financially. What mattered most was that the content was authentic, Greenwald thought.

The Intercept Brasil got ready for the leaks on the evening of Sunday, June 9, almost a month after Greenwald first talked to the hacker. Greenwald, who normally works from home, went to Rio's newsroom. The team published three papers at nearly 6 pm, which they said relied on a large repository of information provided by an anonymous source.

The reports revealed how a group of federal prosecutors had planned to prevent the presidential elections of 2018 from being won by the Workers' Party. In Portuguese, the prosecutors were part of a sprawling anti-corruption task force called Operation Car Wash-Lava Jato. Their inquiry reported that a massive web of money laundering and bribery between state-owned corporations and major figures from the biggest political parties in Brazil had been discovered. These revelations have led to hundreds of prosecutions, the most notable of which was that of former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, known as Lula, who left office as one of the world's most influential political figures in 2010.

The prosecutors for Car Wash argued that as a kickback, Lula had earned a beachfront triplex, and from there they described him as the "maximum leader" of a sprawling, corrupt network. Lula was imprisoned in 2018 and stopped from running (again) as the candidate of the Workers' Party in the presidential election of that year. Lula was a clear favorite to win, and his disqualification paved the way for the stunning victory of Bolsonaro in the polls. Sérgio Moro, the judge who presided over the Car Wash proceedings, was named Minister of Justice and Public Security after Bolsonaro's victory. Moro became one of the most famous and influential, based on his popularity as an anti-corruption crusader.

But now, in the very cases he was expected to adjudicate, including the one that convicted Lula, the Intercept's leaks revealed how Moro had colluded with the Car Wash prosecutors.

Their early readership on the Intercept's website was six or seven times higher than for any other story the site had written, five minutes after the stories went live. "Soon #VazaJato was trending on social media, roughly translating to "Car Wash Leaks. The Intercept report was featured on the flagship news program of Brazil's biggest broadcaster, Globo, a few hours later.

The media explosion was particularly gratifying to Greenwald because he knew he could continue feeding the story. "I knew it was going to dominate politics and headlines for weeks, if not longer, once that initial reaction occurred that way," he says.

Left-wing parties soon called for the resignation of Moro. He refused to step down, alleging that he had been the target of a brutal, orchestrated cyberattack by experienced and well-financed hackers. He also indicated that there had been international participation, referring pointedly to the Russian roots of Telegram. Moro's insinuations barely answered the content of the news of the Intercept, but they fed into a query that was on the lips of everyone: Who was the source of Greenwald?

A four-hour drive inland from São Paulo, Walter Delgatti Neto grew up in Araraquara. Araraquara is a friendly if unremarkable settlement of low-rise, flat-roofed buildings among a smattering of incongruous tower blocks, surrounded by an expanse of green fields, a small town of 200,000 inhabitants, around the same size as Boise, Idaho.

Delgatti lived with his parents in Araraquara until he was 7 years old, when they broke up. He was then carted between grandparents: "My mother unfortunately left me on the sidewalk of my paternal grandmother's house, literally de mala e cuia "—an expression meaning "with all one's earthly belongings." As a child, Delgatti had a hard time making friends. He had auburn hair, unusually for Brazilians, earning him the nickname Vermelho, which in Portuguese means "red." Delgatti struggled with his weight as well. He'd been bullied.

"Delgatti was a complicated young man, according to Gustavo Henrique Elias Santos, who has known Delgatti since he was about 15 or 16. Santos says, "I always felt pity for him. "He had a strange family." Delgatti's earliest recollection of Santos is at an Araraquara gathering, where Santos played a set as a DJ. Santos noticed Delgatti, the only face in the audience who was really watching him, grinning oddly from the crowd.

Though Delgatti had succeeded in establishing a rare bond with him, Santos had learned not to believe any of what Delgatti had told him. Santos says, "Walter is a great storyteller." He adds, "Not all he says is a lie," but he doesn't know how to tell the whole truth. He writes a terrific script.

Delgatti and Santos were maturing into tiny but extravagant troublemakers. One morning in May 2013, the police stopped Delgatti, 24 at the time, and Santos, 22 at the time, on the highway leading out of Araraquara. They were found carrying fake papers, stolen credit cards, 14 checks, and more than a thousand Brazilian reais in cash in their silver Toyota, along with a bank statement showing the amount of 1.8 million reais (approximately $900,000). Ariovaldo Moreira, a local lawyer they met, called the couple. The chief told Moreira when he arrived at the police station that the youngsters were unable to account for the cash or the funds in the bank account. When the bank statement was seen by Moreira,

Delgatti and Santos were identified by Moreira at the time as small-time crooks and scammers who were rarely associated with something significant. Despite lacking employment, they often had plenty of cash. They made videos showing car trunks full of chains of cash and gold. They were lovers of weapons. "Their lives were like a film," says Moreira. Santos was convicted in his early twenties of carrying illegal weapons. The line between pranks and petty scams was also blurred by Delgatti's longer rap sheet. Moreira remembers how Delgatti booked stays with bogus credit cards at luxury hotels; he filled in at gas stations and sped off without paying. Despite having the cash to pay the money, he missed out on restaurant bills.

Delgatti was caught flashing a fake police badge at an amusement park in 2015, when he was 26, attempting to cut a queue for rides. Delgatti led the officer to the car where Santos and Santos' girlfriend were, where a real policeman apprehended him. In the trunk, the officer found a weapon, and Santos was arrested. Never will those close to Delgatti know why he did any of the stuff he did. Delgatti gets a kick out of tricking others, Moreira says. "He is undecipherable," says Santos.

Delgatti seemed driven, if anything, principally by a desire for fame and notoriety. On the way, though, he was charged with crimes that would haunt him. The same year as the theme park incident, in connection with a rape investigation, police raided Delgatti's apartment. Delgatti denied the accusation, and her testimony was later revised by the accuser and the charges were dropped, but the police discovered a forged ID during the raid that made it look like Delgatti was a medical student at the University of São Paulo. A handful of antidepressant pills, 84 clonazepam tablets (which can treat seizures, panic disorder, alcohol withdrawal, or insomnia), and a slightly limited amount of "restricted medication" were also identified.

A vehement sense of injustice in Delgatti was sparked by the drug charges. Delgatti says, "The false charges left me extremely outraged." "I use those drugs to this day."

Delgatti enrolled in school at a college in Araraquara in the face of mounting legal problems, choosing to study the law even as he was being followed by it. Once again, like several classmates, he didn't get along. He appeared determined to cover his legal baggage, but he was overplaying his hand, as ever. He went so far as to file a police report for "slandering and defaming him" in the classroom in his first year against some of his fellow students. "They're saying that I'm a hacker and that I'm diverting money from third party accounts," Delgatti told the police.

Delgatti's charges eventually caught up with him in June, 2017. He was sentenced to two years in jail and spent six months behind bars before being released to work in a semi-open prison for the rest of his term, ensuring he was allowed to go out by day but had to return at night. He was hitting bottom. "They fucked Walter. He didn't even have ten dollars to buy bread,' says Santos. "I know because I lent him 10 bucks." Delgatti was cleared of his conviction for drug trafficking in June 2018, but he still had to serve the remainder of his term for possession of false papers.

Delgatti missed town at some point in 2018. He relocated to a slightly larger city named Ribeirão Preto, about 55 miles northeast of Araraquara, and enrolled in another law school there. Desperate to avoid his legacy, Luiz Henrique Molição, a budding political junkie who sympathized with the Brazilian left, befriended a much younger classmate. Delgatti himself had no interest in politics, but he wanted to impress Molição, who was a teenager. He described himself as the son of a deceased neurosurgeon and said that his late father was living off an inheritance. Delgatti says, "I was afraid of him knowing my true identity." "I've been on the run, living a double life."

It was about this time at some stage that Delgatti discovered a hacking method that would further complicate that double life. The hack took advantage of a function provided by a Brazilian voice-over-IP company that allowed account holders to change their caller ID, the number registered at the end of a call received. This function is made for a convenient virtual lock-picking system, coupled with the fact that many telephone providers in Brazil allow individuals to access their voicemail by calling their own number. He could spoof their telephone and access their voicemail if a hacker simply changed his caller ID to the number of someone he wanted to target.

With access to someone's voicemail, a hacker with little technical expertise and no specialized equipment could, it turned out, do quite a bit of harm. For example, Delgatti found out that he could use this VoIP spoofing method to attack Telegram accounts. They had the option of requesting a verification code via an automated voice call from Telegram at a time when a Telegram user decided to connect their account to a new computer. Delgatti discovered that he was able to spoof the phone of a victim to request the code. Then, if the automatic voice call from Telegram did not move, because Delgatti launched the hack late at night while his victim slept, or kept the line occupied by calling his victim to the sam at night.

Delgatti says he chose Telegram because, during a court hearing, he had once seen Bombardi, the local prosecutor who had pursued him, using the app. "Because he wanted to fuck the life of the prosecutor, he started this hacking," Moreira says.

True to form, there was no stopping Delgatti's commitment to trouble. Early in 2019, he hacked the Telegram account of his friend Gustavo Santos. Both stopped talking. Santos says, "I was pissed, really pissed." The hacking of Delgatti into the Telegram account of Bombardi also gave him access to the address book of the local prosecutor and the contacts of several other public authorities. "And from there," Moreira says, "everything began."

Santos joined much of Brazil in celebrating the Carnaval in March 2019. At some point, he says, he got a cryptic message from his estranged friend Delgatti during the week-long festivities. Here's a real hacker," the message said. Santos said he didn't know what Delgatti was talking about, and didn't think much about it."

But one of Delgatti's yarns wasn't spinning. According to police investigators, Delgatti had hacked the phone of Eduardo Bolsonaro, a congressman and the third son of President Jair Bolsonaro, at 3:34 a.m. on March 2, the official start of Carnival. Forty-five minutes later, Carlos Bolsonaro, the second son of the President, also a politician, was hacked by Delgatti. Shortly afterwards, Delgatti himself hacked the president's computer, although he obviously was unable to download anything. And he kept going, working his way through a long list of strong public figures, including federal prosecutors, members of government, and senior judges.

Delgatti said what he was doing to many friends, but like Santos, they had a difficult time understanding what was true, which may have made it easier for Delgatti to include so many people in his hacking spree. For instance, he carried out some of his hacks from the VoIP account of Santos, making Santos look like an accomplice.

Similarly, another Araraquara acquaintance, a former Uber driver named Danilo Marques, was roped in: Marques allegedly allowed Delgatti to open multiple accounts under his name over the years and helped him launder money from Delgatti's various scams. Now, he used an internet connection and an IP address that was under the name of Marques, as Delgatti hacked his way into the federal government.

Delgatti also had contact at the time with a freelance computer programmer and restaurateur called Thiago Eliezer Martins dos Santos, who since childhood has gone by the nickname Chiclete or bubblegum. The two met in 2018, according to both men, when Eliezer sold a Land Rover to Delgatti. "("I had the impression of a slick man who talks a lot," says Eliezer of their first meeting.) Eliezer admits that he "made a program" for Delgatti, helping him set up a VPN for private internet access that allowed Delgatti to mask his position. Eliezer did not play a role in Telegram hacking, according to both men, although he did discuss it with Delgatti. Delgatti described the hacks as a money-making scheme at first,

Then there was an 18-year-old budding socialist, Luiz Molição, whom Delgatti knew from law school. Molição had heard Delgatti talk critically about Operation Car Wash and the government of Bolsonaro, which attracted his attention because he wanted someone familiar with politics to assist him in gathering the information he had hacked. So he showed Molição the phone numbers he had drawn up for various famous people, including Alexandre de Moraes, the minister of the supreme court, and Danilo Gentili, the right-wing humorist, and asked for Molição's help with the next step of his scheme. The two went on to build an online dialog that was fervent.

On April 26, Delgatti hacked Deltan Dallagnol, who was then considered a national hero, into the Telegram account of the lead prosecutor in Operation Car Wash. Dallagnol says he soon found that, although he hadn't read them, several telegram messages he had received were marked as read. "He looked at the use of his Telegram account: "I saw that in other locations and countries there were active sessions." Dallagnol initially imagined that scammers were trying to get his credit card information, "but then we recognized that the assault spread to other prosecutors," he says. "We have been deleting messages and apps, changing passwords, and taking precautions."

But it was too late; Delgatti had already accessed Dallagnol's chats and contacts and downloaded them. And a few weeks later, on Mother's Day, 2019, Delgatti launched the hack that would open to the world his findings. Manuela d'Ávila got a Telegram warning that morning that someone was trying to reach her account in the US state of Virginia. Then a second message was sent to her from a Brazilian senator she met. D'Ávila tried calling him, but there was a busy line. Then another message from the senator's account pinged into her telegram: "Do you trust me?" ”

"Of course! Of course! "Responded d'Ávila, puzzled.

"This is not the senator, I have to tell you." D'Ávila was surprised. "I have information on crimes committed in Brazil by the authorities. And I will hand over to you. "You are the person who has to receive it." She was the person most likely to be able to "save the country," the hacker said, as a leader of the Brazilian left.

With that, the hacker left the profile of Senator Telegram and emailed d'Ávila from another account. The person told d'Ávila that she had hacked her own phone, giving her screenshots of conversations she had with another influential leftist politician. But d'Ávila was reassured by a hacker that she was not their target. D'Ávila contacted her attorneys promptly. She feared, in all probability, that this was a scheme to trap her with political enemies. Her attorneys agreed.

Yet there was something that gave d'Ávila pause about the way the individual wrote. "The story of the hacker seemed unreliable but not malicious either: "It was more like it was a dream, you know? "She's telling. "These were the things he said that were so grandiose: 'I will save the land! You are the one who can help me! We are going to make everything change! Lula's going to escape jail! " The hacker also invoked the election slogan of d'Ávila, 'Lute como uma garota! -"Fight as a girl!" Out of the texts, a clear psychological trend emerged; d'Ávila felt a similarity to a loved one (who she chooses not to name) who is often prone to great leaps of imagination. It's been t

The individual wanted to entrust all the information to her, but d'Ávila, a former journalist, realized that her status as a politician would make people doubt the leaks, and that she would be hard pressed to determine the material's veracity. "She told the hacker, "We have to think about how you are going to do it. She said he wanted to talk to a journalist.

Skeptical, the hacker was. He told d'Ávila that he had found evidence in the Brazilian press of corruption. So d'Ávila instead proposed to a famous American reporter: "We have to speak to Glenn, the Snowden case reporter," she told the source. He is the best in the world." D'Ávila suggested that the security of the material and the source would also be uniquely capable of ensuring Greenwald." "Because the authorities are talking about very serious crimes, about information that is very important to the country," said d'Ávila. If they're going to kill you, where would that knowledge be? ”

The source agreed, delighted by the allusions to the case of Snowden.

As it happens, with Operation Car Wash, Greenwald had a very complicated past already. There had been critics from the very beginning who thought the anti-corruption task force was colluding with Moro to threaten the Workers' Party and Lula. (In 2016, when then-judge Moro leaked hidden wiretaps of a breathless, affectionate conversation between then-president Dilma Rousseff and Lula, their suspicions were aroused, which seemed to indicate that the two were coordinating to protect Lula from prosecution.) But among those critics, Greenwald was not. He says that the Car Wash task force never felt "super antagonistic" towards him. In fact, in a speech at a 2017 award ceremony for anti-c

But now, after the Mother's Day phone call from d'Ávila, Greenwald was shocked as he started digging through the avalanche of documents that were slowly being uploaded to his new Telegram account. "I kind of felt betrayed, actually," he says. Greenwald learned that the conspiracy between Moro and federal prosecutors against Lula and the Workers' Party went deeper than even their most fierce opponents had expected.

The leaks revealed, most explosively, that Moro helped design the criminal cases he would then adjudicate. Moro offered, in one case, to bring Dallagnol in contact with a source who had potential proof against one of the sons of Lula. Dallagnol, the prosecutor in the case, also expressed deep concern to Moro and other colleagues about how flimsy his case was in messages that date back to Lula's trial. Dallagnol wrote to colleagues shortly before he accused Lula of taking a beachside triplex as a bribe: "They will say that we are accusing based on newspaper articles and fragile evidence." When Dallagnol eventually used the triplex accusation to portray Lula as the mastermind of a sprawling proof.

The Intercept team determined that the first collection of stories would be released on June 11 until Greenwald and his colleagues had a solid understanding of what was most newsworthy. But something happened on the 5th of June that threw them away: Sérgio Moro publicly revealed that he had just been hacked. His phone had received SMS messages from Telegram, suggesting that an unsolicited computer had accessed his account. Moro asserted that no content had been extracted by the suspected invaders, but the hack created a media storm. Then a steady stream of prominent individuals and political figures came forward to say they had invaded their accounts in the same way.

Greenwald, who had known that the hacking spree from his source was over, was taken aback. He got in touch immediately and asked if the source had been behind the hacking of Moro's phone. If so, in an on-going cyber assault, it might make the Intercept appear complicit. The source denied it vehemently. Greenwald recalls, "He even feigned being offended that I would think that they would do something so primitive."

Then, on June 7, at around 8 pm, the hacker called to ask for advice about what to do with all the Telegram accounts he still had access to, once again placing Greenwald in an uncomfortable role. As soon as the articles are written," said the source, "they're all going to delete their chats, they're all going to delete Telegram, so we wanted to know... what do you suggest doing? In essence, he asked Greenwald if they could carry out the Telegram chat data export before the victims could actually cut off access.

"It's hard, because I can't give you advice," answered Greenwald. "I obviously need to be cautious about all that I'm saying."

A delicate response was set out by Greenwald. "It's certain they're going to accuse us of being involved in the hack," he said. He pointed out that in a "very safe" offshore spot, the Intercept had stored all the material it obtained from the hacker. There is no intent, no excuse for you to keep something, I think, right? Although making it clear that the option was up to the hackers, Greenwald said. "Right, perfect," said the source, thanking the journalist.

You have any questions, call me, OK? "According to an audio recording of the call that police later found on Delgatti's MacBook, Greenwald said.

On June 9, two days ahead of time, The Intercept Brasil went to print. (Greenwald says that Moro's hacking allegations have nothing to do with the decision.) The publication said its findings were focused on a trove of secret files, including private messages, audio recordings, photographs, and judicial records. The Intercept wrote, distancing itself from the suspected Moro phone hack, that it had obtained its material weeks ago.

That same night, a statement condemning the hackers' "criminal action" was released by the Car Wash task force and indicated that the invasions could threaten the protection of the authorities and their families. Moro, meanwhile, said that the messages in his conduct did not indicate any "abnormality"; he also cast doubt on their validity. Neither the task force nor Moro agreed that the messages were accurate. Even then, there was an outcry. The legacy of the whole anti-corruption operation of Car Wash was put into doubt. And there was plenty of content still to write. As Intercept Brasil drafted follow-up articles describing ever deeper collusion and corruption, Greenwald broke off communications with respect to

The government and media also went into a whirlwind of speculation about the sources of the leaks as the nation roared over the consequences of the hacked content. And yet there was no effort by Delgatti to cover his tracks. He continued to hack. He spent hours keeping numerous Telegram accounts open at once in front of his computer screen. He had more than a hundred compromised accounts set up to be tracked in real time. Delgatti claims that at times, for 48 hours straight, he was awake.

Delgatti also took to Twitter to mock his most high-profile victims. Replying to a Dallagnol tweet, Delgatti claimed to have evidence that the Car Wash leaks were genuine, three days before he was hacked, citing the time and date of messages on Dallagnol's computer. "And Delgatti tweeted to Moro on July 7: "Every day that your protection passes is getting more insane. "The house has fallen, it won't do any good to cover the sun with a sieve." On social media, he even criticised Bolsonaro. Yet Delgatti's conduct was so blatant that it begged to be disbelieved, tweeting from his personal account, with a profile picture of himself laughing and wearing red sunglasses.

Delgatti hacked Joice Hasselmann, a right-wing politician close to Bolsonaro and the leader of his far-right faction in the lower house, into the Telegram account just after midnight on July 21. Hasselmann posted on social media the next day a video saying that her mobile phone had been invaded. Undeterred, Delgatti continued to hack a key Bolsonaro cabinet minister, Economy Czar Paulo Guedes, into the Telegram account. That would be his ultimate hack.

Ariovaldo Moreira, Delgatti's former lawyer, woke up early on the morning of July 23rd in Araraquara, feeling glum. Life had become stagnant for Moreira; he had recently separated from his wife. His legal practices had become monotonous. Moreira immediately dropped to his knees after his morning stretches and prayed to the Virgin Mary: 'Help me, Santa Maria! "He was begging. "I need a change. In my life, I need something."

As it would happen, a drastic change was descending on Araraquara that very morning, in the form of a tightly coordinated federal police crackdown dubbed Operation Spoofing. Early-rising locals had noticed police cordoning off several streets, a strange sight in their sleepy city. At around 8 am the officers entered Delgatti's grandmother's house but didn't find him there. Shortly afterward police burst into Delgatti's apartment in Ribeirão Preto, the city where he had been attending law school, and found him sleeping. Delgatti had been up for most of the past two days, poring through Telegram accounts on his computer. He had finally taken some sleeping pills and gone to bed around 3 am. He

Others who would receive a visit from police that morning were far less prepared.

In São Paulo, Delgatti's old friend Gustavo Santos was pinged awake by a cell phone alert. Santos, who now lived with his girlfriend in Brazil's largest city, had installed a network of cameras and sensors at the empty home he still maintained in Araraquara. The devices sent alerts to his phone when they were tripped. Sometimes the sensors were triggered by cats or bugs; this time they were being triggered by an early morning police raid, but Santos was oblivious. “I was really doped up from sleeping medicine,” he says. So he went back to sleep.

At around 8 am the buzzing of his apartment's intercom woke Santos again. He dragged himself up and answered. “Gustavo,” the intercom barked, “there is a Sedex here for you. You have to sign for it.”

Santos didn't recognize the doorman's voice. “Man, you can sign for me,” Santos said into the intercom, refusing to come down. But as he hung up, Santos thought: “Fuck, this does not smell good.”

Santos went to the window, parting the curtains a crack. He glimpsed several figures dressed in black approaching his apartment building. Now fully awake, he frantically started cleaning up his apartment—ripping up documents and flushing any potentially compromising material down the toilet. (Santos dealt extensively in cryptocurrency trades and other schemes.) Then, remembering the nearly 100,000 Brazilian reais in cash he had in the apartment—about $25,000—Santos went to the bedroom where his longtime girlfriend, Suelen Oliveira, was still sleeping; neither the buzzing intercom nor Santos' frenzied movements had woken her. “Su,” Santos whispered, waking her up. “You have to hide this for me, because the police are here.” She blinked at him, confused. “She didn't understand a thing,” Santos remembers.

The doorbell started ringing. There came a loud banging on the door. Then the door burst open.

Santos moved toward the police as they broke in and thrust a hand in front of them. At 6'3" and 340 pounds, with close-cropped hair and a tattooed neck and hands, Santos could strike an imposing figure. “Hold on, you're not coming in without a warrant,” he said, imagining that it was the regular civil police at his door. The operation commander stepped forward: “Young man, calm yourself. This is the federal police here. And yes, we have a warrant.”

Santos froze, and he says the police pushed his face against the wall. After reading him his rights, a policeman asked Santos a question that made little sense to him at first: “Aren't you the hacker?”

“You've got the wrong person,” exclaimed Oliveira, who had appeared in the bedroom doorway.

The federal police ransacked the apartment and found the 100,000 reais. Then the commander told the couple to collect some extra clothes. They were going to Brasilia, the nation's capital, more than 600 miles to the north.

At the airport, the couple were shocked again to see they were not taking a commercial flight but were being led toward a Brazilian air force jet. “What the fuck is all this?” Santos thought. After boarding the plane, the police cuffed Santos' hands and ankles to a chain wrapped around his waist. “We were treated like killers,” Oliveira says.

The jet took off and landed about an hour later in Ribeirão Preto. The couple were allowed to leave the plane to use the restroom. There, in the hangar of the airport, they spotted Delgatti standing between two federal police officers, wearing a suit and tie. “And I knew right there,” Santos says. Delgatti had dragged him into the biggest mess of his life.

“Keep him far from us, or there's going to be hell,” Oliveira told police.

When Santos caught his eye, Delgatti was grinning. Santos recognized the same strange smile Delgatti gave him all those years ago when he was DJing at the party, the earliest memory he had of his friend.

Santos also spotted Delgatti's friend Danilo Marques; he had been arrested in Araraquara while in class learning to be an electrician.

After he'd done his stretches and dropped to his knees in prayer, Moreira had gone to the gym in Araraquara, and then to his office. He was wearing Bermuda shorts—his usual attire when not expecting clients. At 10 am, sitting in front of his computer, Moreira got a call from Santos' mother. “Ari, it's full of police at the house,” she told him. The police were searching Santos' family home and Santos' own nearby house. “It's probably nothing,” Moreira assured her. “Santos gets himself in trouble all the time.” But soon Santos' sister was on the line saying Santos had been arrested in São Paulo. Moreira told her that the police needed a warrant. He went back to work.

Moments later a photo of the warrant landed in Moreira's WhatsApp. Sighing, he started to read it. His eyes latched on to a name: Sérgio Moro. He went back and read again. Santos, the warrant said, was wanted in connection with the hacking of Moro's phone. This, Moreira realized with shock, was linked to Vaza Jato, the Car Wash leaks. “Gustavo did this?” he thought. “It is not possible.” But there it was, in black and white.

Moreira ran to his son, a lawyer who worked with him in an adjoining room of the office. “Behold!” he cried, excitedly banging his desk. “The show is about to begin.” Moreira dashed for the elevator, a flash of Bermuda shorts, his son trailing after him. What had happened? “Turn on the TV, because you're going to see me there!” Moreira exclaimed and stepped into the elevator. He drove home, started packing, and got himself booked on the next flight to Brasilia.

On the evening of the arrests, Luis Flavio Zampronha de Oliveira, the federal police chief in command of Operation Spoofing, finally got to sit down with his chief suspect after weeks of hunting. It was almost anticlimactic. Delgatti admitted to the hacks right away. He said he had acted alone and that everything had started when he hacked Bombardi, the prosecutor in Araraquara who had pursued him for years. He described how the prosecutor's phone book had led him to other officials, and finally to Dallagnol. He admitted that he had, in fact, been the one who hacked Moro's Telegram account. He admitted to hacking Manuela d'Ávila—whose number he had gotten through the phone book of the impeached ex-president Dilma Rousseff. Delgatti also claimed to have hacked Lula's Telegram but said he possessed no record of that.

As it happened, in the form of a tightly orchestrated federal police crackdown called Operation Spoofing, a dramatic shift descended on Araraquara that very morning. Early-rising locals had observed police cordoning off many avenues, a strange sight in their sleepy community. The officers entered Delgatti's grandmother's house at around 8 am, but they did not find him there. Shortly afterwards, the police broke into Delgatti's apartment in Ribeirão Preto, the town where he attended law school, and found him asleep. For most of the past two days, Delgatti was up, poring through Telegram accounts on his machine. Finally, he took some sleeping pills and went to bed at around 3 am. He

As the federal police scoured the 7 terabytes of information stored on devices they had seized in their raids, they found evidence of 6,508 calls made to 1,330 different numbers, resulting in 176 successful invasions. They also found that suspicious sums of money had circulated among their suspects in just the past few months. But a clear picture of the motives behind the hacking scheme never quite came together. Certain text exchanges between the suspects seemed to suggest a conspicuously timed change in financial fortunes; in April 2019, for instance, around the time Delgatti was hacking Dallagnol's phone, he had texted Marques to say “the storm is over” and the “bonanza has come.” And Santos was evasive under questioning about his sources of income and cryptocurrency trading, which made prosecutors wonder whether the suspects had been paid in cryptocurrency to conduct their hacks. But ultimately they found no evidence that Delgatti had carried out his hacking spree for money—only that their suspects had been separately involved in various petty financial frauds for years. For the police, as for everyone who knew Delgatti, the reasoning behind the hacks remained fundamentally mysterious. Zampronha, the federal police chief, kept asking Delgatti why he did it. There was no clear answer.

The first time Moreira was able to see Delgatti was at the suspects' preliminary hearings. The lawyer was in the waiting area with Santos and Oliveira—they were in handcuffs, alongside armed police—when Delgatti came in wearing a suit: “Hey, what's up Ari!” Delgatti cried when he saw Moreira. “Did you see what I did?”

Delgatti was charged with being the ringleader behind the hacks. Santos, Marques, and Oliveira were charged as accomplices; the main evidence against them appeared to be that some of the hacks were carried out from their IP addresses. All of them were accused on separate charges of being members of an organized crime ring.

On September 19, a second phase of Operation Spoofing went into action. The freelance computer programmer Thiago Eliezer was arrested in Brasilia. The 19-year-old law student Luiz Molição was arrested outside Ribeirão Preto. Eliezer was accused of developing techniques used in the crimes, while Molição, investigators alleged, had helped Delgatti compile the material and conduct some of his communications with Greenwald, and also participated in the hacking of Joice Hasselmann. As part of his defense, Molição claimed that Delgatti had manipulated him into helping; he described Delgatti as a “narcissistic sociopath.”

Greenwald was named in the charges too, for having “incentivized and directed the group during the period of the hacks.” The prosecutors' supposed smoking gun was Greenwald's cautious response when his source called him up for advice. But in August, Brazil's supreme court forbade Greenwald's prosecution, citing the constitution's articles on freedom of the press, and the federal police say he did not participate in the alleged crimes associated with the leaks. Even so, federal prosecutors have continued to pursue charges against Greenwald and have appealed the supreme court's decision. President Bolsonaro has publicly threatened the journalist: “Maybe he'll do jail time here in Brazil,” Bolsonaro said in one interview. Greenwald and his family have had round-the-clock security since the first stories were published. The Intercept, meanwhile, has kept publishing stories based on the leaks—more than 100 to date. (On October 29, Greenwald resigned from the Intercept over a disagreement with American editors there, but he went out of his way to voice his respect for the Intercept Brasil.)

On November 8, 2019, Lula was released from prison, just as Delgatti had boasted would happen when he first contacted Manuela d'Ávila. Lula went on to demand access to all the messages between Moro and the prosecutors in Operation Car Wash, citing their role in helping to clear his name.

As for the enormously popular justice minister and “anti-corruption” crusader Sérgio Moro, his credibility was badly damaged. He hadn't been hacked by a foreign intelligence operation, as he had strongly implied, but by small-time scammers. After the leaks, Moro kept a low profile, and in April 2020 he resigned from the government after coming into conflict with Bolsonaro. Moro has since accused the president of several crimes. But he says that ever since his messages were leaked to the Intercept, he has periodically deleted his chats, so he no longer has many of the messages between him and Bolsonaro that would have provided concrete proof. This is the closest Moro has come to admitting the veracity of the leaked messages. He declined to comment for this article.

In written responses to my questions, Dallagnol still affirms that the Intercept's leaks showed no evidence of “illicit activity” by public authorities or “any crime.” Dallagnol also dismisses the Intercept as biased, accusing its staff of “making terrorism and personal attacks on social media.” He adds, “It was militancy, not investigation or journalism.” Ultimately he is defiant: “Car Wash was and is the greatest anti-corruption work in Brazilian history,” he says. It was a “hundred times bigger than Watergate,” he adds, “which isn't something we should be proud of, because it shows just how far corruption can go. The investigation was an earthquake that shook the state of systemic corruption.”

Many people in Brazil remain incredulous that a fraudster from Araraquara was behind the biggest leaks in Brazilian history. Conspiracy theories have circulated linking the hackers to communists, the Workers' Party, or other wealthy financial backers. Some have even pointed to Delgatti's childhood nickname—Red—as a sign of his supposed hard-left politics. Speculation continues in some circles that the group was paid in cryptocurrencies, though Delgatti denies having ever used them.

According to Eliezer, Delgatti assured him in prison that they wouldn't be locked up for long, thanks to a tia—literally meaning aunt. He seemed to be alluding to some powerful contact: “He talked many times about a tia and that she would help us,” Eliezer tells me in written answers to my questions, provided through his lawyer. (Delgatti denies saying this.) But as the months rolled by and the other suspects were released pending trial, Delgatti remained in custody.

Delgatti was held for a year in Block F of the Papuda Penitentiary Complex in Brasilia, which was ravaged by Covid-19. More than 1,000 inmates contracted the disease. For many months, it was difficult for Moreira, who once again began representing Delgatti late last year, to speak with his client and old friend. But in May and June, Moreira was able to deliver questions to Delgatti for me.

In responses delivered through Moreira, Delgatti wrote that he did what he did both to save Brazil “and because I myself had been wronged.” He went on: “I never asked money from anyone, what I wanted was justice.” Since the media attention has died down, Delgatti has despaired at the lack of action against those exposed in the leaks. “I think that I should be free,” Delgatti wrote. “Without a doubt I could be helping justice with regards the crimes committed by the operators of Car Wash.”

In Delgatti's answers to my questions, there are hints of a motive. “I never felt so good in my whole life,” he wrote of the moment when the leaks first came out in the Intercept. “I was proud of my achievement—I'm a vain person, and I had the feeling of a mission accomplished.” He also seemed disappointed that he is not adored in Brazil the way he imagined he would be.

The commander of Operation Spoofing, Luis Zampronha, believes that Delgatti must be punished for his crimes. In the only interview about the case that he has given, Zampronha described Delgatti to Quiziosity as narcissistic and troubled but fit to stand trial, and certainly not worthy of adoration. In Zampronha's mind, Delgatti is a scam artist who managed to invade the private lives of authorities, and no grand ideological hacker. “He is not Snowden,” Zampronha says.

Most Brazilians would agree. The tale of a ne'er-do-well turned cyber-crusader simply doesn't fit anyone's script. Now an entire country is in much the same position that Delgatti's associates from Araraquara have often found themselves in, never knowing how seriously to take a serial fantasist.

On October 17, Delgatti was finally released from prison to await trial in Araraquara; he now wears an electronic ankle monitor. There was very little media comment on his release. Just before this magazine went to press, I spoke to him over a voice line, in the first and only interview he has given. He was audibly emotional about the injustice he feels he has been dealt. “In my opinion I should be honored as a hero, and not labeled a criminal,” he said. But he became somewhat evasive when I brought up something he'd written earlier. At one point in prison, Delgatti had told me that he only gave a portion of the material he had hacked to Greenwald. “It's only the tip of the iceberg,” he had said.

When I asked him on the call how much more material there was and what he planned to do with it, he chortled and said he'd better not answer that. “It affects my personal freedom,” he said. Maybe there is no other material. But if it exists, it could be a time bomb waiting to explode in Brazil, and Delgatti could yet receive the adulation he dreams of. Or it could detonate and leave him in yet another cloud of smoke.

Updated 11/13/2020 12:10 pm EST: The subheadline of this article has been updated to reflect that Walter Delgatti approached Glenn Greenwald last year, not last fall as previously stated.

DARREN LOUCAIDES (@darrenloucaides) wrote about Italy's techno-utopian Five Star Movement in issue 27.03.

This article appears in the December 2020/January 2021 issue. Subscribe now.

Let us know what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor at mail@Quiziosity.com.

Monday, January 4, 2021

In the United States, what are the oldest cities?

In the United States, what are the oldest cities?

In 1776, the Thirteen Colonies may have proclaimed their independence, but there were towns and settlements in the US long before it really became a nation. In the United States, what are the oldest cities? Below, we have them identified.

Bear in mind that many early settlements are either historical sites or have been assembled to form our modern day cities. We also taken note of the modern-day names where appropriate. With that in mind, the ten oldest towns in the United States are here.

In the United States, what are the oldest cities?

Uh. 10. Quincy, Massachusetts-1625

In 1625, just southeast of what is now Boston, this Massachusetts town was first founded. The city eventually settled on its new one in 1792 after going through a few name changes. Quincy currently acts as a place of historical interest and has a population of 95,000.

9. New York, New York-1624-1624

The country's largest city has not always been around, but has been in existence since 1624. After Dutch settlers selected the perfect spot for their New Amsterdam along the Hudson River, they built the settlement into a prosperous town. The town is now home to an extremely large population of around 8.6 million.

8. Massachusetts, Gloucester, 1623

Taking its name from Gloucester, England, this maritime town was incorporated about twenty years after it was first settled by English colonists in 1623. The population of Gloucester today has grown to 30,000 residents. In Gloucester's history, fishing is vitally important: the Fisherman's Memorial of the city was erected to remember the thousands that have been lost at sea over the years.

7. Dover, 1623, New Hampshire

Dover was originally named Bristol by the British colonists, who first arrived in 1623, with a population of just over 31,000 people. Dover's early success with its shipbuilding industry led to an increased variety of manufacturing endeavors that has evolved over the centuries to include textile mills and electrical machinery, among other innovations.

6. 1620, Plymouth, Massachusetts

Plymouth, yet another city in Massachusetts, can trace its history back to 1620. The site of the famed Plymouth Rock was the first spot for Pilgrims to make the trip from England. They settled the land and developed it into the new city of around 60,000 people over the next 400 years.

5. City of Jersey, New Jersey, 1618

Delaware Native Americans called it home until Dutch settlers claimed this peninsula area as Paulus Hook in 1618. A few times before 1674, the settlement changed hands between the Dutch and the British, when Britain regained it in the aftermath of the Dutch War. As it was named in 1820, Jersey City now boasts a population of over 270,000 inhabitants.

4. Albany, New York 1614-1614

Originally the location of the Dutch West India Company's small trading post, Albany has a tradition of settlements that originated in 1614. In honor of the Dutch royal family, it was known as Fort Orange and became Albany when Britain took possession of the settlement in 1654. Albany, the state capital of New York since 1797, has a population of approximately 98,000 residents.

Reading further: Why is Albany the New York Capital?

3. 1607 Jamestown, Virginia

The first English permanent settlement in the United States was established in 1607. Due to its ideal set of conditions for hunting, resource collection, and protection, Jamestown was claimed by members of the Virginia Company in 1607. Both the historic site on Jamestown Island and the replica of the Jamestown Settlement are national historic parks today. These sites are located near modern-day Newport News, Virginia, a major city with a population of 179,000 people.

2. 1607, Santa Fe, New Mexico

Santa Fe, the only landlocked city on this list, was founded between 1607 and 1610. The first to take possession of the city from the Native Americans were Spanish colonists. Before Santa Fe eventually became the property of the United States after the Mexican American War in 1846, sovereignty was then passed to Mexico. The city is presently home to a population of 84,000.

Reading further: Why is the capital of New Mexico located in Santa Fe?

1. St. Augustine, Florida, 1565-

More than 40 years before their first permanent settlement was founded by the English colonists, the Spanish had already constructed theirs. In 1513, as part of his search for the Fountain of Youth, St. Augustine was the landing spot of the famous European explorer, Ponce de Leon. Settlers, however, did not come into the country until 1565. It is the oldest official city in the entire country and, with just 14,000 individuals, has the lowest population of any city on this list.

You might enjoy these others from the Quiziosity Blog, if you liked this post.

  • What are the tiniest of states?
  • In the US, Amusing Town Names
  • What are Europe's Oldest Countries?

Sunday, January 3, 2021

What is an audit and why is it required?

What is an audit and why is it required?

Millions of people around the nation are filled with fear every April as we approach the last month of the tax season. It's do or die time, or it's more about doing or being punished in this situation and probably sent to prison time. But just because you end up paying your taxes, it doesn't mean that you're exempt from some kind of consequences automatically. Even after taxes are submitted, millions of people are still waiting with bated breath to see whether they will end up being audited or not. But in the first place, what exactly is an audit?

And what's an audit?

Audits are not simply an excuse for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to find people to give fines to and prosecute, despite what many people believe. They are essentially an objective review of the accounting records of an individual or group in order to ensure that the records are an accurate reflection of the financial position of the person or business.

It is possible to do these audits internally or externally. Although the IRS carries out a lot of audits every year, private third-party companies carry out most of the country's audits. Getting an external audit conducted at least once a year is part of the legal duty of a publicly traded company.

Reasons why an audit has been completed

It will help to put the minds of shareholders at ease when a company's financial statements are checked over by someone outside the company. Other businesses are taking this a step further by carrying out monthly audits during the year to ensure that their records are consistently correct.

In order to ensure that they have the right amount of money on hand, businesses that deal largely with cash will also complete regular audits. It would be difficult to say whether or not any of the money is where it is supposed to be without these daily audits.

The IRS will perform audits to minimize the "tax gap" when it comes to an individual's own personal taxes. This is simply the difference between what is owed to the IRS and what is actually earned by them. IRS audits may come at random or may pick those taxpayers on the basis of any questionable behavior in the past.

The Types of Audits

Audits may be conducted either internally or externally, as previously stated. Subcategories of audits are under each of these groups, which decide precisely what the auditing process would look like.

The auditor may either be a statutory auditor or an external cost auditor for external audits. The financial statement is checked by statutory auditors and they aim to find any anomalies or errors. To assess whether or not there are any irregularities reported on them, external cost auditors are charged with looking at cost statements and sheets. Regardless of the type of auditor employed to do the job, external auditors adopt their own set of guidelines that are entirely independent of what the standards of the organization are.

There is technically only one group for internal auditors. However, as another potential form of internal auditor, consultant auditors can be used. Internal auditors are directly employed and operate within their guidelines by the organization that they are charged with auditing. They transmit any data that they find to the managers, board members, and stakeholders of the organization.

Consultant auditors do not necessarily do their work internally, but they do use the collection of guidelines of the organization when doing their job. When they feel that they do not have the time or money to audit some aspects of their business, an organization will normally employ a consultant auditor.

Forms of Standards for Audits

So far, there has been a lot of reference to standards, but no clarification of where these norms come from. Here is where we will break down the governing bodies responsible for setting these criteria.

Internal audits, as previously stated, meet the criteria set by the organizations themselves. Unless the company is, of course, public. In which case, the Public Company Accounting Control Board sets and enforces the requirements.

Standards may come from two separate locations for external audits. Either the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) or the International Board of Audit and Assurance will determine them (IAAB). National audits are carried out using the Widely Agreed Auditing Standards set out by the AICPA, while the International Auditing Standards set out by the IAAB are used for international audits.

Did this article make you appreciate it? You will like these posts from the Quiziosity Blog as well.

  • Who's with the US money?
  • Weird Rules of the State
  • What is the College of Electors?

Saturday, January 2, 2021

Hugh Glass was who? The Guy Too Angry to Die

Hugh Glass was who? The Guy Too Angry to Die

Hugh Glass was who? The Guy Too Angry to Die

Hugh Glass was who?

Do you recall when Leonardo DiCaprio was in a film about a man who was literally too angry to die? The Revenant is based on a little more than "just give his award to Leonardo DiCaprio," Hugh Glass, his protagonist, was a real dude who was too angry to die. So who, in truth, was Hugh Glass? He wasn't even Leonardo DiCaprio, hint.

Here's a fun fact of trivia. You should know that Glass existed between 1783 and 1833. But did you also know that in modern day Scranton, Pennsylvania, he was born? Only for you fans of The Bureau.

How many times has Hugh Glass almost died?

To be frank, who knows how many times a man who is too angry to die has nearly died. Although in a super long telephone game, a lot of Glass's story is possibly mythologized, his reputation for having a serious case of old man power.

But Glass was quite a negotiator, too, since Glass was a pirate as well. Our angry frontiersman, a former sailor, was once a sailor who had found himself on the poor end of Jean Lafitte. The past behind Lafitte is not important because Lafitte was a pirate, which is important. Lafitte offered Glass a position with the pirate crew after obviously deeming Glass worthy. Provided that the other choice was to be on the angry side of a bunch of pirates, Glass chose to join them (probably pragmatically).

Though he is best remembered for his angry bear saga, Glass also spent time in the late 1810s to the early 1820s with the Pawnee people. He was not, supposedly, very willingly there, he was caught and inches from being (again) on the bad end of ritual sacrifice. With an offer of vermilion powder to win favor, Glass is said to have scraped by. So he's had quite a few opportunities to flex those social diplomatic skills.

Why did Glass end up caught by the people of the Pawnee? Well, probably the whole Manifest Destiny thing, for starters. Glass, however, was not eager to be a pirate forever, and sought a great escape that eventually led to his capture. 

All of this and we haven't even met the bear yet.

That Thing of the Whole Bear

Apart from "how accurate that one movie was," this is what most people google Hugh Glass for. Tip: not too much.

Glass was chilling as a fur trapper by this time. That means that he spent a lot of time outside, where the world isn't very kind to you. As a result, Glass found himself on the sharp end of a grizzly (honestly, how many bad ends will a guy end up on in a lifetime?). Well, as he collaborated with William Henry Ashley (one of those major Manifest Destiny guys), there's more sense to hit, and they find themselves on the run. Since, you know, the whole incident where border guards were sort of super-invasive on Native American territory.

Glass was targeted sometime in the on-the-run timeline by a grizzly in present-day Lemmon, South Dakota. If you've never seen (even if you have) a grizzly bear, they could theoretically lift as much as 1,000 pounds. While the weight of the grizzly bear varies from a few hundred to 500 pounds, depending on whether you're inside or on the shore, it's enough to say that even the weakest grizzly might throw all of us around like a ragdoll. 

Sadly for the bear, Glass had the strength of weapons and even mates. It's said that his ribs were exposed to his back from lacerations, and he had a broken leg (maybe an arm too) as well as a punctured throat. But that doesn't mean Glass won. 

Hugh Glass, also known as, was certifiably not having a nice time.

How Wrathful Was the Glass?

The response was very straightforward. Not because of the bear, but because of the people who had left him behind. If you hadn't guessed that, mountaineering is hard enough to take care of when you don't have a dying man. So the expedition agreed to leave two of them to remain with Glass until he died, give him a semi-proper funeral, and then go back. One was called John Fitzgerald, and the other was Jim Bridger, a bright-eyed 19-year-old boy. As if those weren't the boundary names of the 1800s.

Except the Glass didn't die and Fitzgerald lived long enough to persuade Bridger to leave Glass behind. They took all the glass gear, too. After all, a dead man doesn't need any mountain equipment. Glass's rifle was amongst the gear. 

Although most of us would probably gawk at that being a super important detail, a super valued possession was getting a nice gun in the 1800s. Glass set off on his six-week adventure to what we now know as Chamberlain, South Dakota (it was Fort Kiowa back then). This is just over 200 miles from where he was reportedly mauled, for those keeping track.

Glass seemed to have let go of the rage somewhere along the way, however. Anyway, at least for Bridger. Also, yeah, they were noticed by Glass. He ended up forgiving Bridger and used his heart to give him some advice from the old man, because at the time of the incident, Bridger was just 19.

Whether or not Glass had the same feelings about Fitzgerald varies, but Fitzgerald lived and Glass got his gun back is widely accepted. Some versions of the Glass story claim that he still forgave Fitzgerald, but others argue that Fitzgerald joined the army, effectively rendering him immune to Glass because a lot of wrath would be brought down on his head by that kind of murder. 

So, how exactly did Glass die?

Yeah, Glass wasn't immortal, but even less thrilling than the rest of his story was his ending. As a fur trapper, Glass would spend the rest of his life, which would also bring him into conflict with the Native American people. He was shot in 1833 and killed in present-day Montana.

Is that actually a little better than finding another bear, we suppose?

Want to see the bears more? Here, check them out.

Friday, January 1, 2021

Judge Says No to Putting

Welcome to the latest and hopefully enhanced Replay, the twice-monthly column of Quiziosity, where we round up some of the most fascinating news happening in the video game community. We have info about Nintendo's face-off with a TikTok developer this time around, the war of Epic Games with Apple, and one modder's search to release a 60-fps version of Bloodborne. Let's start off.

During Epic's Litigation, Fortnite Back on Apple's App Store As stated by our friends at Ars Technica, a federal judge rejected an Epic Games appeal that would have forced Apple to allow Fortnite to return to the iOS App Store while the two companies are awaiting the outcome of their lawsuit. It's the latest in a big legal dispute between the two companies based on the in-app purchasing system for the game from Epic's Direct Purchases, and it basically ensures that Epic will not be able to sell Fortnite for the time being on any of Apple's platforms. Judge Yvonne Gonzales Rogers claimed in her ruling that any damage sustained by Epic during this time is its own fault because "this predicamen"

When Epic launched its direct payment option in the iOS edition of Fortnite, a move in breach of the requirements of the App Store for vendors, the controversy between Apple and Epic began. "After Apple removed the game because of the infringement, Epic sued, alleging that "unreasonable and unconstitutional" was Apple's dominance of the iOS market. The case proceeded, and Rogers said in her ruling that it was too early to pass any significant judgment on Epic's claims about potential breaches of antitrust.

"Epic CEO Tim Sweeney tweeted sad lyrics from the Eagles song "Hotel California" in an obvious response to the decision. The move, taken straight from the instant-messaging playbook of a teenager, shows, once and for all, that video games are not for adults.

Pokémon References In other legal news, we now turn our attention to a story that may sound familiar to long-time readers: when faced with the work of a tiny founder, Nintendo is litigious. This time, TikTok influencer Digitalprincxss, known until recently as Pokeprincxss, is the founder, as stated by Kotaku. Nintendo recently sent Digitalprincxss a cease-and-desist order because of her use of Pokémon images in her products and content, asking her to change her name and pay back profits to Nintendo for the use of her intellectual property.

Notably, on an OnlyFans site, Digitalprincxss also produces adult content, a move she claims is directly related to the decision of Nintendo to take legal action against her. "Nintendo doesn’t want people to think that I’m in any way, shape, or form affiliated with them, or that I have a partnership with them, and it all comes back to me being an adult entertainer," she said in a recent video. And while Nintendo's intentions are difficult to guess, the company is definitely cautious when it comes to its image, so it doesn't seem entirely unlikely.

Bloodborne Modder Threatens to Release 60-fps Mod if Sony Doesn't Do It First Lance McDonald, a prolific FromSoftware games modder, like that one villain in that one Marvel movie with the pleasant jawline, looked deep inside his heart, found a need there, and decided to take care of it himself. The need is to play Bloodborne, the exclusive PlayStation 4 FromSoft, a little better in this situation. McDonald has been working on and demonstrating a mod for months now that allows the game to run at 60 frames per second on PS4 and PS4 Pro consoles, a major change from the normal 30 fps of the game and a modification that works surprisingly well for an unintentional feature on the Pro at least.

Now, as Kotaku has posted, McDonald said that unless Sony beats him to the punch, he'll release his mod. If the PlayStation 5 is released, I will release this patch publicly and Sony has made it clear whether or not Bloodborne will be improved in some way on that system,"I’ll be releasing this patch publicly once the PlayStation 5 has released and Sony have made it clear whether or not Bloodborne will be enhanced on that system in any way," "Out of respect for PlayStation, I want them to have the first chance to put 60 fps Bloodborne into the hands of players."

While no official functionality of this sort has been announced, it is not outside the realm of opportunity. But if Sony wants to prevent a bunch of Bloodborne intrepid players from trying to crack their PlayStation 4s to install this mod, it's easier for the company to crack.

Super Mario Sunshine for the Nintendo Switch as part of the Super Mario 3D All-Stars Series

Super Mario Sunshine has a reputation among the 3D Super Mario games. The only one released on the Nintendo GameCube, it is generally considered … bad. I would like to submit to you that this is nonsense. I will concede that it's not as smooth to play as, say, Super Mario Odyssey , and it can be at times very difficult. But these hurdles obscure what a special, fascinating package Sunshine is. This game is weird , and I mean that in the best way. This is a game where Mario, on a tropical vacation, gets arrested and is forced to clean up magical toxic waste, with the help of a sentient water hose, as a form of community service. It's one where most of the cast has voice acting, and whe

Super Mario Sunshine is unlike anything else out there, is what I'm saying, though it has had a clear stylistic influence on one of Nintendo's more modern hits: Splatoon. Just look at those ink puddles. Also, the game has something most Mario games lack, which is a clear, focused sense of atmosphere. Every moment of this game, at least when you're not frustrated by dying too many times, feels like a beguiling dream of an island getaway. Wait 'til it gets cold outside, then pop this in. You might be glad you did.

It's time to learn about Covid-19 and again with Surfaces

Beth Kalb was concerned because of the pews. This summer, like many places, the century-old Catholic church she attends in a small town outside Minneapolis reopened its doors with new disinfection rituals. Kalb recognized the side effects easily. The varnish on the pews had started to wear, and the wood was always sticky with disinfectant, so the voluntary cleaners had begun to eliminate the tacky build-up by using soap and water. They had been in for weeks, and the cleaner had already washed up. Plus, after each use, all those chemicals could not be good for the individuals who were spritzing and wiping down the worship room. Kalb understood, as a nurse, the value of handwashing, but it all seemed a little bit like that. Surely it was too much for the wood.

For Erin Berman, these were books in Fremont, California. A federal initiative to help reopen libraries, named Realm, commissioned experiments in the spring to see how long the virus persists on items they borrow. Researchers borrowed materials from the Columbus, Ohio, library system and applied a virus inoculum to them in a nearby laboratory to see how long they could stay infectious. They began initially with books, calculating the amount of virus left after a day or two, but extended to magazines and DVDs and USB drives in subsequent months. A fourth round of tests in August answered the issue of putting books in stacks, rather than individually setting them out. Protected from light and drying air, after six days, the researchers were able to locate virus particles on them. On leather book covers, the virus lasted at least eight days in a fifth round of tests decided this month.

The organizers of the Realm stressed that none of what they reported was guidance; it was study intended to educate the employees of individual libraries who determined what to do in the homes of people with all those objects accumulating dust, and likely germs. They also noticed, however, that disinfecting every page of every book was not possible. Too many library employees were considering "book quarantines" that lasted a week or more after seeing the results.

Berman was aware of the practical problems posed for so long by placing books in purgatory, but she had a wider concern: that all this research promoted an undue obsession, or even a fear, of the items that librarians are supposed to share with the public joyfully. It was difficult to understand what those numbers, the number of days, the number of viral particles that remained, actually meant to spread Covid-19 across books, but among her colleagues, their very presence had caused anxiety. And she suspected that it was taking attention away from all the other tasks she and her colleagues had to do to safely reopen, to reimagine a shared space in which citizens could no longer remain secure, in which Plexiglass will now mediate social connection. "I was starting to get really irritated. I hear, "We are librarians." We need to be doing research,' says Berman. "We should not be operating in fear of all industries."

For Emanuel Goldman, a Rutgers University virologist, the worries started with his elderly mother-in-gentle law's nagging. "She said to me, 'Wipe this down, wipe that down,'" he says. At the height of the pandemic, he was compulsive. The demands, a series of small acts to keep his household secure, seemed fair. He recognized that it was possible to spread other viruses, the technical term for spreading a virus across objects, and at that time the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had no guidance on SARS-CoV-2. But he became concerned as he delved into the study himself. There was not much evidence at all that it was applicable to how Covid-19 actually spread, despite all the fixation on how long and how much virus last on surfaces. In July, in a tersely worded commentary in The Lancet entitled "Exaggerated risk of Covid-19 transmission by fomites," he addressed these concerns.

The risk of transmission through inanimate surfaces, in my view, is very small, and only in cases where an infected person coughs or sneezes on the surface, and someone else touches the surface shortly after the cough or sneeze (within 1-2 h),' he wrote. "I do not disagree with erring on the cautionary side, but this can go to extremes that the data does not justify."

That was months ago, and the empirical evidence has tipped in favor of Goldman since then. And yet, here, among countless other disinfection practices influenced by those early experiences, we are all the same, wiping down pews and hiding away books. "It is not possible to undo what was done," Goldman tells me now. "And in order to turn things around, it will take a lot of time and effort."

I wrote in March about what we learned about our knowledge of surface spread at the time, which was very little. It's time to ask, almost a year into the Covid-19 pandemic: What do we know now?

A analysis of how long the novel coronavirus lasted on various types of surfaces was the first widely covered study on fomites and Covid-19, published as a preprint in March by researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles, the National Institutes of Health, and Princeton. Nothing was understood at the time about how the virus was transmitted, so the issue was important. The researchers could still detect the virus after a few hours on cardboard, and after several days on plastic and steel, depending on the material. They were careful to note that their results went just as far as that. They stated how easily in a laboratory setting the virus decayed, not whether it could still infect a human or was even a probable mode of transmission.

But several people had already taken up fastidious practices in the hazy hysteria of the time: quarantining packages at the entrance, bleaching packets of cereal brought back from the supermarket, wearing outdoor hospital booties. A single collection of study findings did not initiate these habits, but it seemed to provide validation along with other early studies finding the virus on surfaces in hospital rooms and on cruise ships.

Dylan Morris, a Princeton mathematical biologist who coauthored the article, remembers with annoyance seeing what he terms "the great freakout fomite." The number of days the virus remained detectable on a laboratory surface was not useful for personal risk assessment, he says, since that amount would depend on how much there was to begin with and on environmental factors that they did not measure in the real world. Plus, the amount of virus that remains does not tell us anything about whether it can reasonably get into the airways of someone and cause an infection. People were really picking up on those utter detectability moments," he says." Everyone wants to know the magical period when everything becomes stable." He says he has avoided giving hard temporal cutoffs in subsequent research."

Since March, additional studies have painted a picture that is much more subtle and less scary. But like that first study, each can be easily misinterpreted in isolation. One clear takeaway is that, given an adequate initial dose, some amount of the virus can linger for days or even weeks on some surfaces, like glass and plastic, in controlled lab conditions. Emphasis on controlled. For example, earlier this month, an Australian study published in Virology Journal found traces of the virus on plastic banknotes and glass 28 days after exposure. The reaction to that number felt to some like a replay of March: a single study with a bombshell statistic sparked new fears about touchscreens and cash. “To be honest, I thought that we had moved on from this,” says Anne Wyllie, a microbiologist at Yale University.

Of course, this was another laboratory study done with specific intentions. The study was done in the dark, because sunlight is known to quickly deactivate the virus, and it involved maintaining cool, favorable temperatures. Debbie Eagles, a researcher at Australia’s national science agency who coauthored the research, tells me that taking away those environmental variables allows researchers to better isolate the effect of individual factors, like temperature, on stability. “In most ‘real-world’ situations, we would expect survival time to be less than in controlled laboratory settings,” Eagles writes in an email. She advises handwashing and cleaning “high-touch” surfaces.

The second consistent finding is that there’s plenty of evidence of the virus on surfaces in places where infected people have recently been. Wherever there has recently been an outbreak, and in places where people are asked to quarantine or are treated for Covid-19, “there’s viral RNA everywhere,” says Chris Mason, a professor at Weill Cornell Medicine. That makes going out and swabbing a useful tool for keeping track of where the virus is spreading.

It’s tempting to piece those two elements together: If the virus is on the surfaces around us, and it also lasts for a long time in lab settings, naturally we should vigorously disinfect. But that doesn’t necessarily reflect what’s happening. In a study published in September in Clinical Microbiology and Infection, researchers in Israel tried to piece it all together. They conducted lab studies, leaving samples out for days on various surfaces, and found they could culture the remaining virus in tissue. In other words, it remained infectious. Then they gathered samples from highly contaminated environments: Covid-19 isolation wards at a hospital, and at a hotel used for people in quarantine. The virus was abundant. But when they tried to culture those real-world samples, none were infectious. Later that month, researchers at an Italian hospital reported similar conclusions in The Lancet.

In addition to environmental conditions, a confounding factor might be saliva, or the stuff that we often mean when we talk about droplets sticking onto surfaces. In her own research, Wyllie has studied how long certain viral proteins remain intact in saliva to help determine the reliability of Covid-19 spit tests. For her purposes, stability is a good thing. But some proteins have appeared to denature more quickly than others, she notes, suggesting the virus as a whole does not remain intact and infectious. That could be because saliva tends to be less hospitable to pathogens than the synthetic substances or blood serums often used in lab-based stability studies.

Consider, Wyllie says, the extraordinary chain of events that would need to happen to successfully spread SARS-CoV-2 on a surface. A sufficiently large amount of the virus would need to be sprayed by an infected person onto a surface. The surface would need to be the right kind of material, exposed to the right levels of light, temperature, and humidity so that the virus does not quickly degrade. Then the virus would need to be picked up—which you would most likely do with your hands. But the virus is vulnerable there. (“Enveloped” viruses like SARS-CoV-2 do not fare well on porous surfaces like skin and clothing.) And then it needs to find a way inside you—usually through your nose or your eye—in a concentration big enough to get past your mucosal defenses and establish itself in your cells. The risk, Wyllie concludes, is low. “I’ve not once washed my groceries or disinfected my bags or even thought twice about my mail,” she says.

Low risk is not, of course, no risk, she adds. There are high-touch objects that merit disinfection, and places like hospitals need clean rooms and furniture. People at high risk from Covid-19 may want to take extra precautions. But the best advice for breaking that object-to-nose chain, according to all the health experts I spoke with: Wash your hands.

Goldman, too, had come to similar conclusions months before all this additional research came out, and US public health guidance followed right along with him. Since his Lancet paper in July, the focus on fomites has waned, and has been replaced by a focus on person-to-person transmission through respiration. The shift was based on epidemiological evidence. Experts knew all along that droplets passed by sneezing, coughing, or speaking were likely an important mode of transmission—that’s just how respiratory viruses tend to move. Over time, it became clear that aerosols, which remain suspended in the air, can better explain why so many infections seemed to be passing between people who did not directly interact, but could have shared the same indoor air. That’s why public health officials now emphasize mask wearing and ventilation. The CDC’s most recently updated guidance, from early October, holds that “spread from touching surfaces is not thought to be a common way that Covid-19 spread.” For those reasons, or perhaps out of fatigue, the scrubbing became less scrupulous over the summer.

But not for everyone. “I think that one thing that has been tough about this pandemic is there has been such a strong initial message that gave people the wrong intuition,” says Morris, the Princeton researcher. For some people, and especially for institutions that were trying to reopen, liable to employees and visitors, priorities had been set based on what we knew back in the spring. It was also a way to show that they were doing something, Morris adds, even if it didn't do much. In July, The Atlantic’s Derek Thompson coined the term “hygiene theater” to describe the rash of corporate disinfection. It’s still around. It’s part of the reason why New York City has committed tens of millions of dollars to cleaning each subway car each night, why Airbnb requires “enhanced” cleaning from its landlords, why countless schools, stores, churches, and offices continue to emphasize disinfection. It’s why some libraries are quarantining books this fall for a week or more. It’s also a factor in what we are now less likely to do, a rationale for why many businesses no longer take cash and why playgrounds have often been among the last outdoor venues to reopen.

“There are bizarre policies that haven’t changed or adapted,” says Julia Marcus, an epidemiologist at Harvard Medical School. “It’s one thing for an individual to decide to stop bleaching their groceries. It’s much more difficult to steer the ship of an institution as the science evolves, with different levels of decisionmaking and different levels of health literacy and risk tolerance.”

What is it about fomites? There’s surely something psychological in the belief that we can “see” an invisible virus, manifesting as an object that we can quarantine, avoid, wipe down. That’s evident in how we think about the research, even. Recall the salt shaker in Germany? Or the elevator buttons in a Chinese high-rise? In New Zealand, there was that hypothesis that containers of frozen fish were responsible for an outbreak there. Some of those conclusions can be attributed to aerosol starting off as a dirty, alarmist word. Public health officials were searching for something, anything, to explain why groups of people who didn’t gather closely were becoming infected.

It’s impossible to rule out that some transmission could occur that way—and examples still come up, like a case in New Zealand possibly linked to a communal trash can—but most incidents now look like a case of shared air. Wyllie points to a friend who remains convinced they got the virus from a contaminated door handle. She thinks that’s unlikely, but for her friend, it’s an answer to a question of how they got sick that ambient virus floating in the air simply doesn’t offer. It’s a good story.

Sharon Streams, director of the Realm project, says she sympathizes with that demand for answers. The group’s research on library materials was conceived after the surface research in March. At the time, the talk was all fomites, at the time. Library employees wanted specifics to better understand how the virus interacts with the billions of materials they handle each year, many of which are currently marooned in people’s homes, exposed to who knows what. “They’re pulling their hair out about what is the appropriate level of quarantine,” she says.

Streams acknowledges that the conditions modeled in their experiments are based on a vague foundation. It’s hard to know whether the researchers started with a realistic dose of the virus, or whether the amount of it that remains on surfaces after a few days or hours would actually cause an infection. (The group’s latest research release, last week, included more language about aerosols and droplets being the likeliest modes of transmission.) But to her, that’s the point of gathering more data. And Streams points out that even if a weeklong quarantine looks like overkill to some virologists or health experts, quarantines and disinfection satisfy an emotional need that’s often overlooked. Much like the wiping down store shelves, church pews, or subway cars, cleaning policies are also about signaling which spaces are safe to come back to—that libraries are ready for visitors and employees. “‘Hygiene theater’ has been thrown around as a bad word, but they’re embracing it to show that we care about the people coming here,” she says. “They feel comforted.”

But communicating that point is difficult. Marcus points back to the original paper on surface spread in March: “They couched it appropriately. But even with those caveats, it spun into a lot of obsessive behaviors,” she says. Even seemingly benign procedures, like quarantining items, can wear people out over time. “There’s such a high level of tension in our lives and decisionmaking right now. We all need to feel some ease,” Marcus says. “For me, the question is, where are the low-risk areas where we can ease off the gas now that we know more about how transmission happens—which is overwhelmingly from being together in indoor environments? It’s not from a book that somebody sneezed on and brought to the library a week ago.”

Worrying about the small stuff exhausts people from focusing on things that do matter. There are all sorts of ways to imagine what might go wrong. Maybe a person feels so confident in the disinfection methods around them that they eat indoors without a mask, despite the much more substantial known risks. Or perhaps someone feels they don’t need to quarantine themselves after traveling because they wore disposable gloves and booties over their shoes on the plane. “When you ask more of people than what is needed, they grow tired of doing what actually matters,” Marcus says. Her advice: Keep it simple.

Read all of our coronavirus coverage here.

That sort of clear, simple guidance is hard to come by. Since The Lancet publication, Goldman has become a consultant and therapist of sorts for people who are questioning the utility of overly rigorous disinfection, but who are unsure of what to make of the scientific evidence. He’s been in touch with administrators at a local school that planned to close once a week for “a deep clean,” but who weren’t paying attention to their ventilation systems. He has fielded inquiries from people who still leave their groceries out for days, and who barely leave the house, encouraging them to find a healthier balance. He may be able to change minds one at a time, he reasons, or at least help people put the risks in perspective. It worked, he says, on his mother-in-law. But behaviors are hard to shift, especially when the decision is made by committee. The tendency, in the absence of firm guidance to do otherwise, is to cater to the most cautious.

In Minnesota, Kalb, who is one of his acolytes, says her concerns about the pews, and the lack of evidence driving the deep cleaning, were carefully considered by the church reopening committee. But her fellow parishioners advised caution. The daily disinfection was part of a list of changes for safe reopening, including cordoning off rows for social distancing and a sign-up process to enable contact tracing. It was safest, the committee decided, to continue doing it all, much like every other nearby church and school and store was doing. After all, Kalb couldn’t point to a specific study that said fomite transmission was never happening. And there was news going around of an outbreak at a church in Texas. “It was like, OK, we don’t want to be that church,” she says. The church now uses a misting machine to spray disinfectant, which requires less active wiping.

It’s tempting, in other words, to play it conservatively, says Berman, the librarian. “Some of it is just making sure the employees or the public feel safe,” she says, and she sees the benefits of disinfecting library surfaces that get a lot of use. But she points out that institutions have the power to alter our perception of safety, cutting through the ambiguity of risk by offering clear guidance. Holding out these scientific conclusions—the number of days the virus lasts on every imaginable type of library material surface—had done just the opposite, she believed, producing more fear than empowerment.

Like so many decisions about risk and public safety in this pandemic, the burden had been displaced onto people like her, a librarian, not a virologist. She marveled at how much effort she was personally expending trying to educate herself and the people around her about the risk of books as fomites, when there was so much else to worry about. And, well, now she had done the research, and she knew the biggest risk in a library is the risk of sharing the same air, not touching the same book. Wouldn’t it be nice if someone with more authority would just come out and say so? “There’s so much fear out there,” she says. “I don’t want to put anyone at undue risk, but I want us to reopen.”

The Teenagers of TikTok Trying to Meme the Vote

Colton Hess is familiar with the ability of TikTok to meet young people en masse. Once, just for opening a banana on tape, he got half a million views. So when he found that youth voter groups were not showing up on the site in the months leading up to the election, he realized that there was an underserved group he might be able to support. I don't have a lot of voter registration experience or advocacy at all," he says, but "I know how to use TikTok. This world of memes and patterns and sounds, I understand. He wanted to use his abilities.

In July, Hess left his job to start Tok the Vote, a TikTok voter mobilization program, as an Amazon product manager. Its goal was, and is, to make voting for young people go viral. There is still a lot of political material on the web, organizations such as the Conservative Hype House (1.5 million supporters) have transformed the views of the right-wing Gen Zers into a meme machine, but when Hess pulled his org together, there was not much circulating about the electorate's more basic life information, such as how to register or cast a vote for the first time. So the 25-year-old, who has the vibe of a president of a student body and a natural talent for coordinating individuals, began recruiting. He lured in most of the creators of Tok the Vote through DM. The pitch was simple: If we create the content and coordinate our efforts, we can make a difference in the 2020 election.

For as long as innovation has existed, Get-out-the-vote campaigns have used technology to target young people. The networks themselves have rolled out a number of tools this year to meet young people on their phones. (TikTok has its own in-app voting guide.) That's cool, but the impact is much greater when the knowledge comes from other young people, according to Ioana Literat, who studies online youth civic engagement at Columbia University. "Young people care most about what their peers think when it comes to voting," she says. If grassroots campaigns aim to illustrate the merits of public participation and do not spread the word through other adolescents and twenty-somethings, they miss a big chance. "We need to talk to them in their preferred language, on their turf, in order to reach young voters," says Literat. "Right now, their turf is TikTok, including when it comes to politics and voting."

Last week, a few dozen developers of Tok the Vote gathered at Zoom to prepare their next campaign. "The system, as set out by Saad Amer, the 26-year-old founder of Plus1Vote, a youth-focused voting organization that partnered with Tok the Vote to organize the call, would be to have everyone make videos with the same sound, a mashup of the "WTF" track of Missy Elliott and the "vote" voice of Michelle Obama. The hope was that the star power of those two women, combined with the influence of the folks o o the influence of the folks o "vote. The Zoom gallery was surveyed by Amer and then stopped to address others. "In fact, spaces like this are truly rare, where all young people are," he said. We have LGBTQ inclusion, we have all the shades, people from various states across America, all coming together from our own viewpoint to do something creative to push it out there. Let's just take a second to appreciate how unique and profuse it is.

As the call progressed, creators shared ideas on how to riff on "WTF." Lauren Ferree (103,000 followers) revealed, in the style of a TikTok makeup tutorial, how she would paint the letters V-O-T-E on her face. "Ben Abiola said, "I kind of want to make a play of Missy Elliott's lyrics (478,000 followers). Like, going to these mailing drop-off boxes where people vote early and encouraging people, as the song says, to 'show us how you do it where you're from.'" Elise Joshi (42,000 followers) went for the frightened straight approach; she would bombard people with statistics to remind people of the issues at stake in this election, using text on screen."

A few months ago, Joshi started making videos on TikTok. She had intended to spend her first semester at UC Berkeley registering students to vote on campus, but this fall, when remote learning kept her quarantined with her parents in Mountain View, she began standing on street corners and keeping signs for passing cars on voter registration. In her region, Covid-19 cases then surged, and even that began to feel risky. So she went home, downloaded TikTok, and began to make videos.

Joshi's videos address climate change ('it's my top issue'), racial equality (she's half-Indian, like Senator Kamala Harris), and the wealth gap (a month of her college tuition will not be covered by the $750 President Trump reportedly paid in federal income tax in 2016 and 2017). But mostly, she's talking about why voting this November is significant. Never mind that never before did Joshi vote herself. Today, she's 18, and she's not throwing her vote away. "It feels really cool that it's my first time," she says. It's like, 'Trump, hey?' I've been waiting for this for four years."

Because of the coronavirus, many of the locations that register first-time voters, such as college campuses, are closed this fall. That puts more pressure on digital instruments to do the same job. "This year, voter registration, outreach, and recruitment are all completely different," says Abby Kiesa, the impact director at the Center for Knowledge and Analysis on Civic Learning and Participation or Circle at Tufts. The void has at least partially been filled by platforms like TikTok. Circle found in a recent survey of young people that 29 percent of 18- to 21-year-olds have learned about the TikTok election. "Young people use the tools they think are going to have an impact on them," Kiesa says. "Some young people are definitely voting as a result of that."

Hess asked the makers of Tok the Vote earlier in the summer to make videos urging individuals to register, just to see if such a tactic could succeed. Hess says that over one weekend, the initiative led at least 3,500 people to register or request a mail-in vote. "(That's based on the number of people who used links directly from the videos of Tok the Vote. After watching those videos, more may have registered separately.) "Now that people are registered," Hess says, "we need to get them to vote.

Turnout among young voters has traditionally been poor, with less than half of Americans aged 18 to 29 voting in the 2016 election. And while Gen Z seems to have an appetite for social issues, it's not clear how much the passion that has led them to protest the polls would translate into topics like gun violence, climate change, and racial inequality. Kristian Lundberg, who studies the political conduct of youth at Circle, says that there is reason to suggest that it would. In 2018, the organization found that engaging in online activism was a major contributor to young people appearing at the ballot box, in part because "voting as a lever for change" was highlighted by youth-led movements such as March for Our Lives and the Sunrise Movement. This year, Lundberg points out that many young people have already voted with mail-in ballots, at a pace that is already "exponentially grea grea"

TikTok youth-led organizations pick up where the other youth-led movements have left off. Aidan Kohn-Murphy, 16, took a leave of absence from school to begin Biden's TikTok, which now includes around 360 founders. The founders of the collective have more than 160 million followers amongst them, a figure greater than the total amount of Americans who voted in the 2016 election. Teens from Pro-Trump have also found a home on TikTok, where the soundbites of the president are quickly converted into memes. For instance, Aubrey Moore, the 17-year-old founder of the Republican Hype House of TikTok, has accrued a powerful coalition of almost 1 million supporters.

Because of the ability of its creators to make engaging in politics seem enjoyable, each of those groups has gained a following, such as taking a clip of Trump dancing at a rally in Florida, overlaying it with a mashup of Coldplay and Savage, and making it into a viral duet. "Creativity is an underused yet essential channel for civic education, and in this sense, TikTok is the best example," Literat says. I am personally struck by the ingenuity of users of TikTok who use songs, memes, dances, and skits to talk about voting. It sounds a little hyperbolic or cheesy, I know, but this is the future of civic education.

That made TikTok an amplifier for misinformation as well. To go viral, there are so few hurdles that distorted information often hit millions of individuals. "I stay away from the For You page to protect my own sanity," says Quentin Jiles, a political founder with 116,000 followers. Last fall, Jiles joined TikTok to share his take on the day's political news (his brand: "Your political BFF"). To get people interested in the discussion, he used every feature in the TikTok arsenal. He recently attempted to use the duet function of the app to get individuals to speak about their early voting experiences, turning voting into a gamified competition. But Jiles worries about how misinformation can gamify other makers. Last week, TikTok banned QAnon-related material, but before that, the conspiracy was widely spread, often among young people. And the same form of coordination that organizations such as Tok the Vote use to inspire more citizens to vote could easily be used for other ways, such as organic voting.

For now, however, as the election draws nearer, TikTok may be the best opportunity anyone has to attract young voters. The makers of Tok the Vote each posted their videos with the Missy Elliott sound on Sunday, urging their colleagues to fill out their ballots and vote early. The best performance of the campaign came from 23-year-old Sam McGraw, who pantomimized the feeling of being too young to go to the polls. "She walks off-screen and returns to the frame a bit older, wearing a Biden-Harris T-shirt, under a text banner: "It's my time to vote at last.

Mnemonic Devices to Learn the Countries of Europe

A mnemonic device is a memory tool used for learning – you’ve got to keep that brain sharp, after all! One of the most popular mnemonic d...